Skip to main content
Comparison Analysis

ABBV vs CVS: 2026 Comparison

Verdict for Passive Income: It's a Draw

Powerhouse Pair: Both have delivered excellent >15% returns. ABBV leads slightly, but both are strong buys.

The Verdict

Powerhouse Pair: Both have delivered excellent >15% returns. ABBV leads slightly, but both are strong buys.

While both are excellent, ABBV edges ahead due to slightly better historical returns and lower volatility, making it the ideal core holding.

33%Correlation

Dividend Yield

ABBV0.00%
CVS0.00%

CAGR (13y)

ABBV20.2%
CVS6.3%

Stress Test: How Did They React?

Real historical performance during key market events (Crashes & Rallies).

Market EventABBV ReturnCVS ReturnVerdict
COVID-19 Crash
Global pandemic lockdown selling pressure
2020-02-19 β€’ 2020-03-23
-31.5%-26.0%CVS Wins
Post-COVID Recovery
QE-fueled tech and growth rally
2020-03-24 β€’ 2021-12-31
+118.9%+99.5%ABBV Wins
2022 Inflation Bear
Rate hikes and tech valuations reset
2022-01-01 β€’ 2022-10-12
+6.3%-14.3%ABBV Wins
AI Boom & Rally
Generative AI hype driving Mega Caps
2023-01-01 β€’ Present
+55.9%-6.2%ABBV Wins

πŸ‘€ Which one is right for you?

Select your primary investment goal to see the recommended choice:

Better Choice:
Both Work

Yield-focused investors won't find a meaningful difference hereβ€”ABBV and CVS both deliver comparable income.

Growth of $10,000

Historical performance if you invested $10k at the start

Data Source: Historical Market Data*Past performance does not guarantee future results

Head-to-Head Metrics

Direct comparison of key investment characteristics

Beta (Volatility)

ABBV
26.33%
CVS
26.29%
πŸ’‘ Effectively the same
Data reflects most recent public filings β€’ Market conditions change daily
Investment Disclosure: This comparison is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Market conditions change rapidly; data may not reflect current prices. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.