Skip to main content
Comparison Analysis

ABBV vs MDT: 2026 Comparison

Verdict for Passive Income: It's a Draw

Distinct Roles: MDT is a stable core holding, while ABBV is a high-growth, high-volatility play.

The Verdict

Distinct Roles: MDT is a stable core holding, while ABBV is a high-growth, high-volatility play.

While both are excellent, ABBV edges ahead due to slightly better historical returns and lower volatility, making it the ideal core holding.

40%Correlation

Dividend Yield

ABBV0.00%
MDT0.00%

CAGR (13y)

ABBV20.2%
MDT9.4%

Stress Test: How Did They React?

Real historical performance during key market events (Crashes & Rallies).

Market EventABBV ReturnMDT ReturnVerdict
COVID-19 Crash
Global pandemic lockdown selling pressure
2020-02-192020-03-23
-31.5%-35.9%ABBV Wins
Post-COVID Recovery
QE-fueled tech and growth rally
2020-03-242021-12-31
+118.9%+34.6%ABBV Wins
2022 Inflation Bear
Rate hikes and tech valuations reset
2022-01-012022-10-12
+6.3%-22.7%ABBV Wins
AI Boom & Rally
Generative AI hype driving Mega Caps
2023-01-01Present
+55.9%+38.0%ABBV Wins

👤 Which one is right for you?

Select your primary investment goal to see the recommended choice:

Better Choice:
Both Work

In terms of dividend income, ABBV and MDT are effectively identical.

Growth of $10,000

Historical performance if you invested $10k at the start

Data Source: Historical Market Data*Past performance does not guarantee future results

Head-to-Head Metrics

Direct comparison of key investment characteristics

Beta (Volatility)

ABBV
26.33%
MDT
22.06%
💡 MDT is less volatile
Data reflects most recent public filings • Market conditions change daily
Investment Disclosure: This comparison is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Market conditions change rapidly; data may not reflect current prices. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.